Just released: How to raise venture capital in 2023

Download

Post-Assignment: What Happens to D&O Coverage When Your Company Undergoes an ABC?

TL:DR

Key Takeaways

Justin-Kozak, Vice President
Justin Kozak

EVP; Life Sciences Practice Lead

Potentially facing insolvency in your company and managing your bankruptcy estate can be the hardest outcome you can face as a founder. Although not everything can go according to plan, despite the hardest of efforts, there are ways to wind down your startup without the financial burden, theatrics, and legal complications of filing for bankruptcy—that’s what an assignment for the benefit of creditors (ABC) is for.

This process was conceived for companies to undergo a smoother insolvency process and maximize return for creditors through various insuring agreements. In doing so, how can company directors and other executives secure their assets during this process, including through liability insurance coverage provided by the insurer?

While an ABC can be the best way to go for your company, there are a few aspects to consider, such as potential creditor claims brought against directors and officers, and the possibility of officers bringing claims. This is, namely, what your Directors and Officers (D&O) insurance policy is there to cover—but once your company is insolvent and assigned to a third party, what happens to your D&O in the case of an ABC, especially in light of potential lawsuits?

The ABC Environment and Heightened D&O Risk

An assignment for the benefit of creditors, or an ABC, is the process by which a public or private company that can no longer operate and fulfill its financial obligations hires a third-party firm to manage and liquidate its assets and distribute them to the appropriate creditors.

This state-law, non-judicial alternative is often preferred over a Chapter 7 bankruptcy for publicly listed companies or private ones, as the latter can have costlier legal fees, lengthier processing times, and sometimes garner more attention from the public. Here’s who’s who in the ABC scenario:

  • Assignor: The insolvent company seeking to liquidate its assets in the most efficient way.
  • Assignee: The fiduciary entity responsible for liquidation, whether by selling, auctioning, or otherwise liquidating the assignor’s assets and distributing them to creditors.
  • Creditor: The entities that are owed loans, goods, or services by the assignor.

The Inherent Risks of Fiduciary Duty Shifts and Legal Claims

As it goes, an ABC’s crucial point is in shifting duties from shareholders and board members (equity) to the creditors as the company enters the “zone of insolvency.” This is the point where directors are instantly exposed to claims of mismanagement, improper asset sales, or preferential transfers that benefit one creditor over another, making risk management crucial.

With such claims, this is where things get tricky for broader coverage, making D&O ABC coverage more crucial than ever.

Often, legal action and claims arise from the assignee on behalf of the creditors, disgruntled unsecured creditors, and even the purchaser of assets, in the case of getting caught in the web of misrepresentations. It’s at this stage that insurance coverage must jump to protect and cover the legal fees and defense costs of the insured directors and officers, and their personal assets.

Securing the Mandatory Defense: D&O Tail Coverage

Insurance policies might be the last thing on your mind during an ABC, and insurers understand this more than anyone. This is why, as a precautionary measure, there’s nothing like Tail coverage as part of your insurance program to keep claims, legal costs, and other issues in check, even past the deadline.

The Lifeline for Past Acts

A D&O Tail insurance policy provides coverage for wrongful acts that occurred before the ABC closing date, but were not filed until years later. A six-year Tail is typically the standard due to statutes of limitations, giving you ample time to review the ABC process and the opportunity to make a D&O claim if needed.

However, some considerations are key to avoiding challenges of policy non-renewal and cancellation. For instance, if the policy is not renewed or the Tail that was purchased before the current policy is canceled or lapses, the right to purchase a Tail for liability coverage may be lost.

Critical Tail Policy Features to Negotiate

In preparation for an ABC, it’s also indispensable to know that the assignee must be contractually required and funded to purchase the Tail for the benefit of the former directors, ensuring adequate coverage.

This is where another kind of negotiation takes place to secure the proper insurance policy for your ABC process. These are the three elements to look out for when you sit down with your chosen assignee:

  • Dedicated limit: Agree to a dedicated and sufficient Tail limit for the directors of the former entity, without being eroded by the purchasers’ or assignee’s claims against your company, whether sold or merged.
  • Retention/Deductible: Ensure the retention is paid by the Assignee or the acquiring entity, not the individual former directors.
  • Entity coverage: Does your D&O include Side B or Side C coverage for entities? Often, the directors are concerned with Side A (personal liability coverage), but the assignee may need Entity Coverage for corporate defense costs, so consider this extra shield when negotiating your Tail.

The M&A Theme: Asset Sales and Successor Liability

An ABC might also create risk scenarios similar to those of an M&A. As a company and its officers get acquired or merge with another (or, in the case of an ABC, get liquidated), distressed asset sales take place to square out debt, leaving purchasers with certain liabilities that we must address.

Although these purchases may be advantageous for buyers, they create classic M&A D&O exposures such as successor liability. So, despite there being Tail coverage that protects the seller’s past acts, the acquirer instantly inherits the seller’s risks, which aren’t included in the Tail.

The ABC process is designed to inherently mitigate these associated risks thanks to the due diligence of specialized firms, but sophisticated might still demand assurances, requiring specific D&O representations.

The Go Forward Trap for New Entity Coverage

Here, it’s relevant to stress that a Go Forward Policy, although it might seem like it, wouldn’t do much to benefit the buyer with direct coverage. This policy is generally irrelevant to the assignor’s previous leaders and their directors and officers liability insurance—they typically have an exclusion clause for prior acts—as their governance ends at the assignment date of the ABC. This is why focus must still remain on Tail coverage, rather than other risk-adjacent policies.

A Suitable Liability Coverage Solution

What works for buyers in M&A scenarios is exactly what can be applied to those involved in an ABC. Distressed sales are usually accompanied by Representations and Warranties (R&W) insurance, which gives assignees and assignors a clean liquidation process while protecting purchasers from financial losses with liability coverage.

It’s important to clarify that R&W does not replace D&O in any way. The former insurance covers contractual breaches, such as misstated financials in the deal documents, while the latter covers wrongful acts, such as breach of fiduciary duty. They are complementary, not substitutes.

The Urgency of the Directors and Officers Insurance Exit Strategy

A D&O insurance policy is often the last to be executed in an ABC, and also the most vital for founders, which is why it’s primordial to secure Tail coverage before assets are transferred to the assignee for liquidation.

In planning for an ABC, Tail premiums cannot become an afterthought. Including it in your D&O, especially as a capital-constrained company contemplating an ABC, can profoundly mitigate risks to the personal assets of the directors.

As such, you’re not just protecting yourself and your individual directors, but also vouching for a smoother ABC process, and potentially gaining the trust of purchasers and creditors.

As a founder, we advise you to get your deal team together with an experienced D&O insurance broker who understands officers liability policies, and legal counsel that can help you negotiate and fund the Tail before the assignment closes. As you look for new horizons, do so with peace of mind.

Related Articles

go_forward_policy
March 10 • Directors & Officers

Beyond the Tail: Should You Secure a Go Forward Policy in Every M&A Deal?

Protect your leadership during M&A by bridging the gap between Tail and Go Forward policies to ensure comprehensive liability coverage.

DO_pricing_trends_2026
January 28 • Directors & Officers

D&O Insurance Pricing: 2025 in Review, 2026 Outlook

Analyze 2025 D&O pricing trends and our 2026 forecast and emerging risks, from AI washing and SEC mandates to shifting underwriting scrutiny for scaling brands.

side a do
October 22 • Directors & Officers

Why Your D&O Policy Isn’t Enough: A Guide to Side A & Excess Coverage

Protect executive personal assets from lawsuits with Side A D&O insurance; it’s non-negotiable when corporate indemnity fails due to risk.

DO pricing trends 2024
February 12 • Directors & Officers

D&O Insurance Pricing: 2024 in Review, 2025 Outlook

D&O insurance pricing is influenced by various factors, so companies need to stay informed and adapt their risk management strategies. Here’s a retrospective look at the 2024 D&O market and what to expect this year.

D&O insurance
April 25 • Directors & Officers

D&O Insurance Pricing Trends 2023

The D&O insurance market was hard-hit in 2021, but 2022 brought some relief that overflowed into 2023. Let’s talk about the trends unfolding and what we can expect in the future.

D&O-insurance-crypto-companies
June 4 • Directors & Officers

The Value of D&O Insurance for Crypto Companies

Crypto companies must battle a slew of risks amid a volatile market. Let’s discuss what exposures leaders face and why D&O insurance is vital.